[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid0rHjVUz2RwAg3BzZv7uehaRWtCU6Q5kYCP1cTdfriryK9fbhtHH5o6AvisuBWU3Dpl":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":17},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"creationTimestamp":7,"description":8,"creationDate":9,"type":10,"tags":11},"pfbid0rHjVUz2RwAg3BzZv7uehaRWtCU6Q5kYCP1cTdfriryK9fbhtHH5o6AvisuBWU3Dpl","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid0rHjVUz2RwAg3BzZv7uehaRWtCU6Q5kYCP1cTdfriryK9fbhtHH5o6AvisuBWU3Dpl","陳宥丞",1769170743000,"#安全不容忽視 #禁止不能躁進\n蔣萬安市長突拋出「大眾捷運擬禁用行動電源」的政策，安全利益良善，但在做法跟程序上，我認為必須改進。\n\n密閉擁擠的車廂內發生鋰電池熱失控自燃，後果非同小可，但一個 #政策如何執行才是是關鍵！\n\n宣導禁令一出，捷運基層同仁就向我反應不知如何稽查？民眾若不配合是否有強制力？未來可以增設安檢設備？設備有爭議誰來認定？\n\n蔣市府慣用突襲式政策不是第一次，前幾週才突襲營養午餐免費政策，配套全無，導致校方與團膳業者措手不及。今天，針對影響百萬通勤族的行動電源禁令，一樣突襲上路，讓人無所適從。\n\n台灣針對行動電源（鋰電池）已有明確的法源規範與國家級的 BSMI 安全認證機制。政策應該漸進式推動，從源頭呼籲民眾使用檢驗合格的產品，或是針對充電行為進行規範，而非一竿子打翻一船人，全面禁止使用。\n\n放眼亞洲，除了中國大陸對地鐵行動電源有較嚴格限制外，多數先進國家並未全面禁止，我和蔣市長日前才剛從紐約考察回國，紐約市針對充電公安疑慮也宣傳先行才逐步裁罰，且地鐵即便老舊，也未見如此因噎廢食的禁令。\n\n我支持加強管理，但反對粗糙的禁止。\n市府應落實以下配套：\n\n1. 確立緩衝期與法源依據：\n重大政策變更必須有公告周知期 ，給予民眾適應時間，並明確指出引用之法條，不是市府禁令一句話就開始執行。\n\n2. 回歸認證機制：\n應宣導並規範民眾攜帶及使用具有國家認證標章之行動電源，針對使用劣質、無認證產品者進行勸導或裁罰，而非懲罰所有使用者。\n\n3. 定義高風險行為：\n是指「禁止攜帶」？「禁止充電」？還是「禁止使用」？定義不清，只會造成執法現場的混亂。\n\n立意良善的政策會被詬病，往往是因為缺乏制度性的思考，我支持捷運安全升級，但請蔣市府要有配套，最怕解決不了問題，反而製造更多對立。\n@頭號粉絲","2026-01-23T12:19:03.000Z","facebook",[12,13,14,15,16],"交通安全","政府監督","公共衛生","防災應變","政治文化",{"tags":18,"all":74},[19,21,23,26,28,31,33,36,39,42,45,47,50,53,56,59,62,65,68,71],{"name":13,"count":20},1063,{"name":16,"count":22},921,{"name":24,"count":25},"公民權利",788,{"name":14,"count":27},444,{"name":29,"count":30},"都市計畫",435,{"name":12,"count":32},304,{"name":34,"count":35},"司法改革",284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":15,"count":46},191,{"name":48,"count":49},"環境保護",187,{"name":51,"count":52},"青年發展",181,{"name":54,"count":55},"教育與托育",147,{"name":57,"count":58},"勞工權益",139,{"name":60,"count":61},"居住正義",133,{"name":63,"count":64},"產業發展",112,{"name":66,"count":67},"長照政策",80,{"name":69,"count":70},"能源政策",64,{"name":72,"count":73},"動物保護",54,[19,21,23,26,28,31,33,36,39,42,45,47,50,53,56,59,62,65,68,71,75,78,81,84,86,88,90,92,94,96,98],{"name":76,"count":77},"性別平等",39,{"name":79,"count":80},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":82,"count":83},"意志力",1,{"name":85,"count":83},"刑事警察",{"name":87,"count":83},"詐欺罪",{"name":89,"count":83},"強制罪",{"name":91,"count":83},"恐嚇取財",{"name":93,"count":83},"警察局",{"name":95,"count":83},"刑事犯罪",{"name":97,"count":83},"消費權益",{"name":99,"count":83},"拒絕勒索"]