[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid0eqvJZ7w6JNQP84Qk27rmQffTE8Qm3D8vJsv5W9kj1SYZbw8C61QCtNRk467ayhdKl":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":16},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"description":7,"title":8,"type":9,"tags":10,"creationTimestamp":14,"creationDate":15},"pfbid0eqvJZ7w6JNQP84Qk27rmQffTE8Qm3D8vJsv5W9kj1SYZbw8C61QCtNRk467ayhdKl","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid0eqvJZ7w6JNQP84Qk27rmQffTE8Qm3D8vJsv5W9kj1SYZbw8C61QCtNRk467ayhdKl","陳宥丞","北檢今日針對柯文哲主席提出起訴，但令人震驚的是，歷經四個月的羈押與調查，檢方竟然無法回答最基本的三個問題：賄款何時收受？在哪裡收受？又流向何處？檢方的指控缺乏核心事實支撐，顯然是一場草率且目的明顯的政治操作。\n\n從案件爆出至今，外界流言滿天飛，北檢與特定媒體，從「收賄700萬」到「新加坡密會」，各種不實指控層出不窮，北檢所謂的「證據」，實在單薄得令人無法接受，這樣的辦案品質，司法單位真的能心安理得嗎？\n\n且起訴書中提及，我曾向柯文哲主席提供議會資料與調查進度，並提到彭振聲出席與否。然而，當時提供的內容均為公開資訊，且完全是透過議會調閱程序取得，並未涉及調查小組的任何內部資料或機密資訊，檢方如此牽強附會的指控，不僅嚴重扭曲事實，更凸顯檢方為達政治目的，不惜濫用司法資源的荒謬行徑。\n\n司法本應守護公平正義，而非為政治服務，這次案件，明顯展現了政治干預司法的醜陋痕跡，羈押手段成為壓迫工具，輿論操作取代真相追求，這種情況不僅踐踏了法治精神，也深深損害了社會對司法的信任。\n\n司法的存在，不是為了某個政黨達成政治目的，而是為了捍衛事實與公平。當檢方忘記自己的職責，真正受害的將是全體市民的權利與社會的法治根基。","","facebook",[11,12,13],"司法改革","政府監督","政治文化",1735208992000,"2024-12-26T10:29:52.000Z",{"tags":17,"all":75},[18,20,22,25,28,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":12,"count":19},1063,{"name":13,"count":21},921,{"name":23,"count":24},"公民權利",788,{"name":26,"count":27},"公共衛生",444,{"name":29,"count":30},"都市計畫",435,{"name":32,"count":33},"交通安全",304,{"name":11,"count":35},284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[18,20,22,25,28,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":96,"count":84},"刑事犯罪",{"name":98,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":100,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]