[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid0YASavpVcc5vF4gfWhw88996Bp4GwSBoJWvhYDw3e5xCD2EbCJ2LVqgM2YGs92dmxl":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":16},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"description":7,"title":8,"type":9,"tags":10,"creationTimestamp":14,"creationDate":15},"pfbid0YASavpVcc5vF4gfWhw88996Bp4GwSBoJWvhYDw3e5xCD2EbCJ2LVqgM2YGs92dmxl","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid0YASavpVcc5vF4gfWhw88996Bp4GwSBoJWvhYDw3e5xCD2EbCJ2LVqgM2YGs92dmxl","陳宥丞","議會工務委員會9\u002F11當日，送來「台北市議會京華城容積違失案專案小組調查報告」的初稿，封面就像是照片一呈現的那樣，連日期都還沒有押。\n\n我隨後跟工務委員會索取電子檔，工務委員會的同仁表示，電子檔內容與9\u002F11的紙本有更動，所以希望我以9\u002F12的這個檔案為主，來作為9\u002F19召開「京華城容積違失專案小組」會議時討論使用。\n\n從這份調查報告裡面可以看到，「結論與決議」已經載明要「待9月19日專案小組會議討論」，審查意見也都還沒有記載，但9\u002F11開始已經有許多媒體朋友知道有這份初稿，所以希望我可以提供內容讓他們參閱，如果我也跟其他幾位議員一樣想要炒作新聞的話，我大可當天就提供出去，畢竟裡面疏漏百出，標題與內容自打嘴巴的部分也令人懷疑邏輯錯亂，基本上都是遵從召集人的意志在撰寫！要做新聞很簡單，但我選擇尊重程序，尊重其他調查小組成員還沒有在9\u002F19的會議陳述意見，調查小組還沒正式通過這份調查報告，所以並沒有給任何一家媒體。\n\n所以這一份資料是9\u002F11、9\u002F12才拿到，裡面也就剛好有當天特定媒體的獨家新聞內容，如果是游淑慧與簡舒培議員所稱的5月就拿到的資料，特定媒體為何寫「近期取得專案小組會議紀錄」以獨家呈現！？簡舒培議員不在專案小組內，所以對於情況無法全盤掌握，我不多做責怪，但基本上這個調查小組會議，常常到最後就只剩下我和召集人開會坐到最後，說我不認真、不負責我無法接受，我也不會去批評她夠不夠格當市議員，畢竟每個人都應該去為自己的支持者和理念戰鬥，夠不夠格當市議員就交由每一區的選民去做決定，我們心存善念，盡力而為。\n\n既然大家都說這是行政調查而已，所以報告可以提供出去，是否就讓有興趣的朋友跟我索取，讓大家看看什麼叫做拼拼湊湊+邏輯錯亂+主觀意志！","","facebook",[11,12,13],"政府監督","政治文化","都市計畫",1726468706000,"2024-09-16T06:38:26.000Z",{"tags":17,"all":75},[18,20,22,25,28,30,33,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":11,"count":19},1063,{"name":12,"count":21},921,{"name":23,"count":24},"公民權利",788,{"name":26,"count":27},"公共衛生",444,{"name":13,"count":29},435,{"name":31,"count":32},"交通安全",304,{"name":34,"count":35},"司法改革",284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[18,20,22,25,28,30,33,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":96,"count":84},"刑事犯罪",{"name":98,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":100,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]