[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid02xoTNtjwYjLd2mNXjZp2Pmf2oj2g133vZifcgMH3E1gjFPKoT9TuwAwrnCYYdM1hYl":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":18},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"description":7,"title":8,"type":9,"tags":10,"creationTimestamp":16,"creationDate":17},"pfbid02xoTNtjwYjLd2mNXjZp2Pmf2oj2g133vZifcgMH3E1gjFPKoT9TuwAwrnCYYdM1hYl","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid02xoTNtjwYjLd2mNXjZp2Pmf2oj2g133vZifcgMH3E1gjFPKoT9TuwAwrnCYYdM1hYl","陳宥丞","京華城整個案子的司法程序裡，除了頻頻發生違反偵查不公開的情事，還有市府無法提供，但有人靠觀落陰卻能看到的產發局條子之外，今天破天荒的，與市議會京華城調查專案小組召集人游淑慧議員友好的媒體，又獨家取得市議會京華城專案調查小組尚未定稿、尚未通過更尚未公告的會議記錄來做獨家新聞，連專案小組成員都是兩天前才拿到，媒體馬上就有熱騰騰的素材可以做獨家？原來屬於秘密會議的會議記錄，是可以這樣提供特定友好媒體使用的。\n\n姑且不論該媒體如何取得會議記錄，新聞內容中提到「黃景茂則說，市長室交辦下來的陳情案都會往上簽，重大爭議案件要由都委會研議；而在洪健益追問下，黃景茂坦言，正式簽陳到市長由市長簽字同意送都委會。」這就是媒體刻意精心設計以偏概全要讓閱聽者接收到的部份資訊而已，並非全部的事實。\n\n真正的事實是，我在專案小組裡當面詢問過黃景茂局長，「京華城案從頭到尾有沒有任何上級的指示，要求你一定要給任何的容積或者一定要達成什麼樣的目標？有沒有任何人為的因素？特別的交辦？特殊的關係？」黃景茂局長當時也是斬釘截鐵的表示：「當然是沒有所謂當面交辦，一切依程序辧理。」\n\n又或者趙議員怡翔也曾經問了黃景茂局長：「都委會到底有沒有權力決定一個案子或者是一項容積獎勵的合法性跟適法性？是來自都發局？還是來自都委會？」\n\n黃景茂局長 回覆說：\n「因為都市計畫案包括主要計畫、細部計畫，細部計畫在地方政府就決定，當然都委會做最後的裁決，都委會是共識決。」「如果不合理都委會就不會通過。」\n\n所以當他們想要陷人於罪的時候，就只會告訴你說—替京華城插隊？黃景茂「自白記錄」曝光柯文哲親簽送都審會；但就是不讓大家知道，市長接到陳情案本來就會交下去給專業局處接手，而黃景茂局長其實更堅持一切都是依法定程序辦理，都委會也是認為合理才通過的。\n\n這才是事件的全貌，但有心的特定人和特定媒體，並不想讓你知道全貌。這就是所謂的「不看新聞會與世界脫節，但是看新聞會與事實脫節。」","","facebook",[11,12,13,14,15],"政府監督","都市計畫","司法改革","政治文化","公民權利",1726358835000,"2024-09-15T00:07:15.000Z",{"tags":19,"all":75},[20,22,24,26,29,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":11,"count":21},1063,{"name":14,"count":23},921,{"name":15,"count":25},788,{"name":27,"count":28},"公共衛生",444,{"name":12,"count":30},435,{"name":32,"count":33},"交通安全",304,{"name":13,"count":35},284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[20,22,24,26,29,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":96,"count":84},"刑事犯罪",{"name":98,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":100,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]