[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid02deF1RMscjGgNnXKXL8PTCSEipdekxmbm9P3hQXNvmAccec4iWVumsp9vrGM5rNB7l":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":17},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"description":7,"title":8,"type":9,"tags":10,"creationTimestamp":15,"creationDate":16},"pfbid02deF1RMscjGgNnXKXL8PTCSEipdekxmbm9P3hQXNvmAccec4iWVumsp9vrGM5rNB7l","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid02deF1RMscjGgNnXKXL8PTCSEipdekxmbm9P3hQXNvmAccec4iWVumsp9vrGM5rNB7l","陳宥丞","#捍衛程序正義 #堅持司法公平\n\n鏡週刊未經任何證實的爆料，不就是赤裸裸的告訴台灣民眾，民進黨政府要不就是放任特定媒體造謠，讓惡質媒體捏造證據博取點閱率和流量，傷害其他認真求真的媒體，造成惡性循環；要不就是違反「偵查不公開」原則，縱容檢察體系選擇性的餵養資訊給特定媒體，讓不同政黨，甚至同黨不同派系的人在未審判之前，就被攻擊成體無完膚的罪人，藉此打壓異己。\n\n這麼毫無掩飾的濫用司法與媒體，很多人都已經看不下去！明眼人都知道，現階段如果不是有司法體系的人員洩漏偵查機密，根本不應有任何媒體得到所謂USB資料，更遑論還煞有其事的敘述或編織是記帳帳冊。\n\n賴清德日前曾說，「只要有涉及違法、只要有證據，就該依法查辦，毋枉毋縱」，這幾天的獨家爆料亂象，很明顯地在司法體系和媒體之間，一定有一邊，甚至兩邊都有人違法，為什麼還不依法查辦？\n\n如果當選總統的目的僅僅只是透過操控司法、利用特定媒體製造新聞來攻擊政敵，那真的是台灣人民的悲哀，對台灣還沒有任何貢獻卻已經讓人民對司法不信任，層次更是遠遠不及同黨的蔡英文前總統！\n\n在無罪推定的原則之下，不管是柯文哲或是彭振聲、應曉薇、甚至沈慶京、鄭文燦，現在都是無罪的身分，都不應該遭受這樣無法證實、卻又鋪天蓋地的杜撰與指控，如果有具體證據，也應該是在審判的時候一一呈現，而不是法官都還沒看到，彷彿特定媒體就先看完且審判！\n\n以前民進黨政治人物最討厭冤獄，用來支持廢死的論述之一也是冤獄，若司法檢察體系的不公不義所造成的，現在人民親眼見證檢方與特定媒體勾串洩密，踐踏法治國原則，未來就會繼續有冤獄的發生，要杜絕這樣的問題，就是在發現問題的時候就必須解決，不能任由這樣的濫權擴大。\n\n法官還沒做出判決，卻因為特定媒體的大肆操作，很容易讓社會大眾誤以為柯文哲主席已經有罪，這就是一種冤。\n\n9\u002F8晚上，請與黃瀞瑩 台北市議員 張志豪  一起為了台灣的司法正義站出來，抗議司法濫權，展現我們的團結，拒絕讓任何人被媒體糟蹋，羅織罪名！\n@頭號粉絲","","facebook",[11,12,13,14],"司法改革","政府監督","公民權利","政治文化",1725683158000,"2024-09-07T04:25:58.000Z",{"tags":18,"all":75},[19,21,23,25,28,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":12,"count":20},1063,{"name":14,"count":22},921,{"name":13,"count":24},788,{"name":26,"count":27},"公共衛生",444,{"name":29,"count":30},"都市計畫",435,{"name":32,"count":33},"交通安全",304,{"name":11,"count":35},284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[19,21,23,25,28,31,34,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":96,"count":84},"刑事犯罪",{"name":98,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":100,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]