[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid02KWmTn5HWPTMPpi3Mg5hK2tT1Y8Jb6yZ4yey6YyfjVp1zcSievHMpx5JS9yBP3LMDl":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":16},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"description":7,"title":8,"type":9,"tags":10,"creationTimestamp":14,"creationDate":15},"pfbid02KWmTn5HWPTMPpi3Mg5hK2tT1Y8Jb6yZ4yey6YyfjVp1zcSievHMpx5JS9yBP3LMDl","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid02KWmTn5HWPTMPpi3Mg5hK2tT1Y8Jb6yZ4yey6YyfjVp1zcSievHMpx5JS9yBP3LMDl","陳宥丞","「2025探花集章活動」成不可能任務？\n\n為了鼓勵市民走出戶外、欣賞台北的花展，市府推出「2025探花集章之旅」，只要在不同花展現場掃描 QR Code 集章，就有機會抽 iPhone、SONY 耳機、AirPods 等大獎，活動初衷值得肯定，乍聽之下也相當吸引人。\n\n然而，最近在與民眾聊天的過程中，有人反映，他在士林官邸賞鬱金香時才發現這項活動，滿懷期待地掃碼參加，卻驚覺——若要抽大獎，必須集滿台北 12 個花展的章，而第一個花展「台北茶花展」展期僅 9 天，早已結束！\n\n「一個為期一年的活動，卻在開始的 9 天內決定誰能抽大獎？」 這樣的設計，讓許多後來才得知活動的民眾無奈錯愕，甚至有網友直言：「12個點都要集滿，也太困難了，根本是不可能的任務」\n\n集章抽獎的確能激勵民眾參與，但若規則不合理，反而適得其反，今年的第一場花展「台北茶花展」不僅展期最短，知名度也相對較低，若市府未搭配足夠的宣傳，能在活動初期就意識到規則並開始參與的民眾恐怕寥寥無幾。\n\n如此一來，後續花展再多，對於許多錯失第一場的民眾而言，等於再無參加意義，這與活動「吸引更多人參與花展」的原意背道而馳，因此，我已透過書面質詢要求市府公園處檢討活動規則，讓更多民眾有機會參與，而非在活動初期就將大部分人拒於門外。我也要求市府檢視目前集章狀況，適時調整規則，確保即便是後來才知道活動的民眾，也仍有參與的動力與機會，真正落實推廣台北花展的目標。\n\n探花集章活動立意上，應該是為了吸引更多市民參與，而非變成少數人才能完成的任務，市府應正視這個問題，讓活動設計更具公平性與可行性，才不負推動城市美學與全民參與的初衷。\n\n#內湖 #南港 #港湖宥丞\n#服務電話 27936656\n#探花集章","","facebook",[11,12,13],"政府監督","公民權利","都市計畫",1742199626000,"2025-03-17T08:20:26.000Z",{"tags":17,"all":75},[18,20,23,25,28,30,33,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":11,"count":19},1063,{"name":21,"count":22},"政治文化",921,{"name":12,"count":24},788,{"name":26,"count":27},"公共衛生",444,{"name":13,"count":29},435,{"name":31,"count":32},"交通安全",304,{"name":34,"count":35},"司法改革",284,{"name":37,"count":38},"地方經濟",276,{"name":40,"count":41},"重大公共工程",258,{"name":43,"count":44},"體育運動發展",202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[18,20,23,25,28,30,33,36,39,42,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":96,"count":84},"刑事犯罪",{"name":98,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":100,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]