[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"achievement-pfbid02HMPqkeVLTVaeFd24ezvpmJhrNWz5Y8Bt8yzw66CaBoDBkXVbDvis39F5aKxktEyBl":3,"tags-陳宥丞-20":16},{"id":4,"postUrl":5,"politician":6,"description":7,"title":8,"type":9,"tags":10,"creationTimestamp":14,"creationDate":15},"pfbid02HMPqkeVLTVaeFd24ezvpmJhrNWz5Y8Bt8yzw66CaBoDBkXVbDvis39F5aKxktEyBl","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.facebook.com\u002FNtuyoyo\u002Fposts\u002Fpfbid02HMPqkeVLTVaeFd24ezvpmJhrNWz5Y8Bt8yzw66CaBoDBkXVbDvis39F5aKxktEyBl","陳宥丞","該改就改，別讓大巨蛋成為不合格的「壞蛋」\n\n＃觀眾席淺色椅吃球　＃球員安全堪憂　#大巨蛋\n蔣萬安 市長在今年1月去大巨蛋視察就曾向遠雄反映過，大巨蛋座椅的淺色設計，不管對於打擊者或外野手接高飛球的時候，都會有球「被吃掉」的影響，但直到議會教育委員會5月去現場視察的時候，遠雄都還沒做出從善如流的改變，我們還是看到特立獨行和全世界其他球場的深色設計不一樣的淺色座椅，我要求市長不要再給遠雄討價還價的空間，該改就趕快改，不能等到使照拿取驗收完畢以後，有任何問題再用公帑買單，既花時間又浪費錢。\n\n＃打者之眼不符合世界規範\n大巨蛋是全台灣球迷望眼欲穿的心願，當然必須以專業的棒球場地為優先考量，這才是台北市之所以會有台灣第一座大巨蛋球場的初衷。加上為了積極爭取國際賽事來台灣舉辦，大巨蛋的球場設計當然必須符合申辦國際賽事場地的規定。\n\n5月去視察時看到大巨蛋「#打者之眼」，對比WBSC（世界棒壘球總會)和大聯盟的規範檢查標準表，打者之眼必須要有12公尺高、24公尺寬，甚至大聯盟官方建議的打者之眼尺寸更大，必須有12.2公尺高、24.4公尺寬，我們的台北大巨蛋「打者之眼」部分是不合規範，對於未來申辦國際賽事是不合格的。\n\n為了確保大巨蛋的安全與合規，我建議市府邀請來自WBSC或日本、美國專門檢驗人員，來協助市府進行驗收。透過專家學者評定向台灣人保證球場可以安全無虞進行比賽，我也贊成大巨蛋應該是在硬體設施、安全標準充分準備好才能啟用，成為一個符合國際標準的體育場館。絕不能讓台灣的球員，冒著安全疑慮與財團建案的壓力下幫市府背書，而這也是我們不會退讓的底線!\n\n#棒球小科普\n棒球運動從19世紀末就有慣例在中外野設立適合打者看球的深色背景，一般稱為「打者之眼」或「打擊視覺牆」。\n打者之眼對於打者的打擊非常重要，因為它能創造一個適宜打者清楚看球投手手中縫線球的背景。","","facebook",[11,12,13],"重大公共工程","體育運動發展","政府監督",1686565768000,"2023-06-12T10:29:28.000Z",{"tags":17,"all":75},[18,20,23,26,29,32,35,38,41,43,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72],{"name":13,"count":19},1063,{"name":21,"count":22},"政治文化",921,{"name":24,"count":25},"公民權利",788,{"name":27,"count":28},"公共衛生",444,{"name":30,"count":31},"都市計畫",435,{"name":33,"count":34},"交通安全",304,{"name":36,"count":37},"司法改革",284,{"name":39,"count":40},"地方經濟",276,{"name":11,"count":42},258,{"name":12,"count":44},202,{"name":46,"count":47},"防災應變",191,{"name":49,"count":50},"環境保護",187,{"name":52,"count":53},"青年發展",181,{"name":55,"count":56},"教育與托育",147,{"name":58,"count":59},"勞工權益",139,{"name":61,"count":62},"居住正義",133,{"name":64,"count":65},"產業發展",112,{"name":67,"count":68},"長照政策",80,{"name":70,"count":71},"能源政策",64,{"name":73,"count":74},"動物保護",54,[18,20,23,26,29,32,35,38,41,43,45,48,51,54,57,60,63,66,69,72,76,79,82,85,87,89,91,93,95,97,99],{"name":77,"count":78},"性別平等",39,{"name":80,"count":81},"737市政陳情",2,{"name":83,"count":84},"意志力",1,{"name":86,"count":84},"刑事警察",{"name":88,"count":84},"詐欺罪",{"name":90,"count":84},"強制罪",{"name":92,"count":84},"恐嚇取財",{"name":94,"count":84},"警察局",{"name":96,"count":84},"刑事犯罪",{"name":98,"count":84},"消費權益",{"name":100,"count":84},"拒絕勒索"]